ELECTRONIC MONITORING AND EMPLOYEES’ PERFORMANCE OF DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS IN CALABAR METROPOLIS, CROSS-RIVER STATE- NIGERIA
Abstract
This study examined the effect of electronic monitoring on employees’ performance of Deposit Money Banks in Calabar Metropolis, Cross-River state- Nigeria. Specifically, the study investigated the effect of software monitoring, video surveillance and biometric technology on employees’ performance of deposit money banks in Calabar Metropolis. The study is anchored on Foucalt’s theory of Pantopticon developed further by Botan. The population of the study is made up of all the employees’ of the five chosen banks in Calabar Metropolis. A sample size of 268 determined using Taro Yamane’s (1967) formula and was distributed to individual banks using Bouley’s (1964) population allocation formula. Data was collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed with Multiple-regressions with the aid of statistical packages for social sciences (SPSS) version 21. The result of the study indicates that electronic monitoring through software monitoring; video surveillance and biometric technology have positive and significant relationship with employees’ performance. Based on the findings of the study, it is safe to conclude that, the adoption of electronic monitoring through software monitoring, video surveillance and biometric technology has improved employees’ performance of deposit money banks in Calabar Metropolis of Cross-River State-Nigeria. In line with the conclusion, it is recommended that Deposit money banks in Nigeria should adapt software/computer monitoring, video surveillance and biometric technology, implement it appropriately and constantly modify it, so as to improve their employees’ performance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Botan, C and Vorvoreanu, M. (2000). What are you really saying to me? Electronic Surveillance in the work place. In: Conference of the International Communication Association Conference, Acapulco, Mexico.
Botan, C.H. (1995). Electronic surveillance in the workplace: Predicting panoptic effects on employees. In: Speech Communication Association Conference, El Paso, TX.
Botan, C.H. (1996). Communication work and electronic surveillance: A model for predicting panoptic effects. Communications Monographs 63(4):293-313.
Chinedu, I.O. (2013) Practical Guide to Research Methodology in Management. Onitsha – Nigeria: Good Success Press
Clark, M. M. and Guerin, L. (2015). The Employee Performance Handbook: Smart Strategies for Coaching Employees. London, UK: Sage Publishers.
Crowell, K. (2002). Importance of biometric Technology. Carnegie Mellon University
Foucalt M (1977). Discipline and Punish-translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Pantheon.
Hair, J.F., Money, A.H., Samuel, P. and Page, M. (2007). Research method for Business. West Susex, England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Hinds, A. (2012). Computer Monitoring In The Workplace and Your Privacy. Your Privacy.
James, M., Rehg and Takeo, K. (1993). DigitEyes: Vision-Based Human Hand-Tracking. School of Computer Science Technical Report CMU- CS-93-220, Carnegie Mellon University
Mishra, J. M., & Crampton, S. M. (1998). Employee monitoring: Privacy in the workplace? S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal.
Segen J. Segen, S. and Kumar, J. (1999). Shadow gestures: 3D hand pose estimation using a single camera.
Sheetal, V. and Chander, K. (2012). Biometric Recognition system: An introduction. Department of computer science and applications k.U; Kurukshetra, Haryana, India.
Shields, J., Brown, M., Kaine, S., Samuel, C. D., Samardzic, A. N., McLean, P., . . . Robinson, J. (2014). Managing Employee Performance and Reward: Concepts, Practices, Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swanirbhar, M. and Saurabh, P. (2016). Biometrics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Application. Management Association, Information Resources. IGi Global Publisher. ppp 1852.
Trucco E. (1998). Introductory Techniques for 3D Computer Vision. Prentice-Hall, Vision and Pattern Recognition.
Zhang, Z. Shan, Y. and Shafer, S. (2001). Visual panel: Virtual mouse keyboard and 3rd controller with an ordinary piece of paper. In Proceedings of Perceptual User Interfaces.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Samuel Terzungwe Akaa, Simeon Terhile Nomhwange, Salifu Tijani Adukanya, Iorbee Igbawase Iorbee
ISSN (PRINT): 2682 - 6135
ISSN (ONLINE): 2682 - 6127
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.