A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF SECULAR HUMANIST PHILOSOPHY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY

Paulinus C. Ejeh (PhD)

Abstract


The secular humanist philosophy advocates the use of reason, compassion, scientific inquiry, ethics, justice, and equality. It proposes that it is only when people feel free to think for themselves, using reason as their guide that they are best capable of developing values that succeed in satisfying human needs and serving human interests. This paper critically examines the secular humanist world-view as well as showcases its social, political, religious and economic implications and consequences for our contemporary society.   The paper argues that the secular humanist philosophy champions both rationalism and irrationalism that would have serious negative consequences in our society. Secular humanist philosophy, though good in many ways, yet has already plunged our society into almost irreversible social, religious and economic problems. The paper therefore recommends that secular humanist’s philosophy must be rejected and its advocacy for a total secularization of the human society stopped at all cost if our contemporary society is to survive and live meaningfully.

Keywords


Philosophy, Secular Humanism, Implications, Contemporary, Society

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Humanist Association, Humanist Manifestos II (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1973), p. 13.

A Secular Humanist Declaration: "Ethics Based On Critical Intelligence", Council for Secular Humanism, (New York: The Free Press, 1983).

Clark, C., “The Myth of the Population Explosion”, in Crisis of Morality: the Vatican Speaks out (Washington, DC., United States Catholic Conference, 1969), p. 48.

Carl, S., Cosmos (New York: Random House, 1980), p. 4.

Dunphy, J.J., The Humanist (London: The Free Press, 1983), p. 7.

Ehusani,G.O., An Afro-Christian Vision”Ozovehe” Towards A More Humanized World, (Atlanta: University Press of America Inc., 1991), p. 203.

Hocutt, M., "Toward an Ethic of Mutual Accommodation," in Humanist Ethics, ed. Morris B. Storer (Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1980), p. 137.

Humanist Manifestos I & II (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1973), p. 11.

Huxley, J., as cited in Roger E. Greely, ed., The Best of Humanism (Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1988), pp. 194-5.

Kurtz, P., Humanist Manifestos I (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1973), p. 9.

Kurtz, P., in the preface to Humanist Manifestos I & II (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1973), p. 3.

Kurtz, P., (ed) "Is Everyone a Humanist?" in The Humanist Alternative, (Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1973), p. 177.

Lamont, C., The Philosophy of Humanism (New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing, 1982), p. 145.

Lipson, H. S., "A Physicist Looks at Evolution", Physics Bulletin, vol. 31, (May 1980), p. 138.

Noebel, D.A., Understanding the Times: The Religious Worldviews of Our Day and the Search for Truth (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1991), p. 200.

Potter, C.F., Humanism: A New Religion (London: Oxford University Press, 1930), p. 22.

“Secular humanism”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_humanism

“Secular Humanism”:https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=secular%20humanist

Sellars, R.W., “The Humanist Outlook,” in The Humanist Alternative, ed. Paul Kurtz (Buffalo: Prometheus, 1973), p. 135.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Paulinus C. Ejeh (PhD)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ISSN (PRINT):    2682 - 6135

ISSN (ONLINE): 2682 - 6127

 

 

   

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.